finra disciplinary action

Naming Names: FINRA's Disciplinary Action Report, April 2014

Each month and again on a quarterly basis, the agency that regulates the financial industry, FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), produces a detailed report that runs down all disciplinary actions recently taken against brokerage firms and brokers. This long and often colorful list of alleged wrongdoing and misconduct reads a lot like a police blotter. We strongly encourage any investor who suspects their broker and/or broker-dealer of having lost them money on dubious terms to at least skim this report to see if you recognize any names.

For our part, in addition to announcing the release of a report to help get the word out about alleged misdeeds, we like to pick out some of the highlights. Specifically, we’re looking for schemes or abuses that might be more far-reaching than the individual cases brought through the FINRA arbitration process. In other words, we name names here because we hope to raise awareness out there about brokers and products that might otherwise go unnoticed except for the case appearing in the report…

Stefani Ann Bennett of USBI (CRD #5890347, Registered Representative, Salmon, Idaho) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which she was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Bennett consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that she, without her customer’s knowledge or consent, withdrew $100,000 in cashier’s checks and cash from the customer’s estate checking account at her member firm’s sister bank affiliate and converted the $100,000 for her own use and benefit. The findings stated that Bennett arranged to have five cashier’s checks issued to her personal creditors in the total amount of $97,592.41, and she retained $2,407.59 in cash. (FINRA Case #2014039668101)

William Bradford Coolidge of Stifel Nicolaus (CRD #1636957, Registered Representative, Cordova, Tennessee) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Coolidge consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he effected trades in elderly customers’ accounts without obtaining the customers’ prior written authorization and without his member firm’s acceptance of the accounts as discretionary. The findings stated that Coolidge implemented a trading strategy in elderly customers’ Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) and individual accounts to switch mutual funds and unit investment trusts (UITs) to other mutual funds or UITs after holding the investments for a short time period. For one of these customers, in the customer’s IRA account, Coolidge effected mutual fund and UIT purchases and sales in the account after holding the investments for a short time period. Given the customers’ age, investment objectives, and risk profile or annual income, Coolidge’s recommendations were not suitable and were inconsistent with their account objectives. The elderly customers incurred losses totaling $195,127.37 and paid commissions totaling $168,091.21. (FINRA Case #2012032916701)

Richard David Jameison Jr. of Blackrock Investments (CRD #2567029, Registered Principal, Devon, Pennsylvania) was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. The sanction was based on findings that Jameison converted $150,000 from an acquaintance who was not his member firm’s customer. The findings stated that Jameison told the acquaintance about an opportunity to invest, alongside a small group of other investors, in a business enterprise that was being formed. Jameison told the acquaintance that his firm was not involved with raising the money for the enterprise and that any investment in the enterprise would not be made through the firm. Jameison also told the acquaintance that he intended to invest in the enterprise. The acquaintance decided to invest in the enterprise, in part because he understood that Jameison would also be investing. The acquaintance wired $150,000 into a securities account that Jameison owned jointly with his wife. Jameison never invested any of the investor’s funds and converted the bulk of the funds for his own use and benefit. Jameison falsely told the acquaintance that he had realized a profit on his investment. On several occasions, the acquaintance asked Jameison to return the funds along with the earnings on the investment. Jameison wrote checks drawn against joint accounts that he maintained with his wife, each for $198,000, and delivered the checks to the acquaintance. Jameison represented to the acquaintance that the checks represented the return of the $150,000 investment plus the purported return on investment. The checks were drawn against accounts that contained insufficient funds and were dishonored. Jameison’s firm terminated his employment, and the acquaintance and his wife filed a lawsuit against Jameison. Jameison paid the acquaintance and his wife $165,000. The findings also stated that Jameison failed to respond to FINRA’s requests for documents and information relating to his dealings with the acquaintance. Although Jameison, through counsel, represented that the effects of Super Storm Sandy interfered with his ability to respond to the requests, FINRA made four separate requests for the documents and information and gave Jameison several extensions. (FINRA Case #2012033364501)

Richard Martin Ohlhaber of Century Securities Associates and Southwest Securities, Inc., (CRD #2154794, Registered Principal, Keller, Texas) submitted an Offer of Settlement in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Ohlhaber consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he participated in the sale of life settlement contracts offered by a company to at least 18 customers without providing written notice of his involvement in the sales of the life settlement contracts to either of his FINRA member firms, and never obtained either firm’s permission to engage in such outside business activity. The findings stated that Ohlhaber received commission checks from the company totaling over $300,000. These checks were addressed to an entity whose sole members were Ohlhaber and his wife. Ohlhaber endorsed these checks and deposited them in the entity’s bank account. Ohlhaber had access to this bank account and withdrew or otherwise used the money contained in this bank account. The company was not an approved product at either of Ohlhaber’s firms. Ohlhaber completed questionnaires at both firms in which he represented that he was not engaged in any outside business activity, and he misrepresented to one of the firms that the entity was a “shell” that was not engaged in any business. The findings also stated Ohlhaber provided false sworn testimony which was material to FINRA’s investigation and as a result, impeded the investigation. The findings also included that Ohlhaber loaned money to customers who were not Ohlhaber’s family members. Ohlhaber never informed his firm about these loans and the firm never pre-approved the loans in writing. The firm’s WSPs only permitted loans between registered representatives and customers who are the registered representative’s immediate family members. (FINRA Case #2012032077901)

Allen Hugo Reichman of Oppenheimer & Co. (CRD #1002285, Registered Representative, Irvington, New York) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Reichman consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he failed to appear for FINRA-requested testimony. The findings stated that Reichman’s counsel informed FINRA via telephone that his client would not appear for testimony until after criminal proceedings against him were resolved, and followed up with a letter reiterating his client’s position. Reichman, to date, has not provided the requestedtestimony. Reichman’s failure impeded FINRA’s investigation into a $30 million margin loan issued by his member firm that was used as part of a fraudulent scheme involving an insurance company. (FINRA Case #2010022584502)

Mark Raymond Talley of Fifth Third Securities (CRD #4969783, Registered Representative, Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky) submitted an Offer of Settlement in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Talley consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he recommended that his customer replace an existing variable annuity with a new variable annuity. The findings stated that Talley misrepresented orally and in writing that the existing variable annuity was out of the surrender period and could be sold without incurring a surrender fee when in fact, the annuity was still in the surrender period and the customer would incur a $15,000 surrender fee if it was sold. As a result of Talley’s representation, the customer sold the annuity and purchased a new one. On a switch form related to the transaction, Talley falsely stated that he verified that the customer’s existing annuity was out of the surrender period and claimed he had obtained this information by speaking to an individual he claimed was an employee of the insurance company that underwrote and issued the annuity. Talley did not, in fact, contact the insurance company. Therefore, the information he placed on the switch form was false. The customer signed the switch form and Talley submitted it to his member firm. The firm filed a Uniform Termination Notice for Securities Industry Registration (Form U5) in which it disclosed that Talley was permitted to resign after the firm determined that he had provided inaccurate information on a client disclosure document. The findings also stated that in connection with FINRA’s investigation into that disclosure, Talley provided false answers to FINRA in response to a request for information. Talley provided partial testimony in a FINRA on-the-record interview, but failed to appear to complete the testimony. (FINRA Case #2012032650301)

Matthew Alan Trulli of Foothill Securities (CRD #3048416, Registered Representative, Visalia, California) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for one year. In light of Trulli’s financial status, no monetary sanction has been imposed. Without admitting or denying the findings, Trulli consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he borrowed a total of approximately $197,500 from his member firm’s customers. The loans were documented with promissory notes. The loans that have reached their maturity date have not been repaid in full. The findings stated that Trulli’s firm prohibited its representatives from participating in borrowing transactions with customers under any circumstances. Trulli provided false information in response to two firm outside business activity reports regarding receiving loans from customers.

--

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined Berthel Fisher & Company Financial Services, Inc. and its affiliate, Securities Management & Research, Inc., of Marion, Iowa, a combined $775,000 for supervisory deficiencies, including Berthel Fisher’s failure to supervise the sale of non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs), and leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs). As part of the settlement, Berthel Fisher must retain an independent consultant to improve its supervisory procedures relating to its sale of alternative investments.

For the full FINRA Disciplinary Action Report for April 2014, please click here.

If you or anyone you know has been the victim of broker misconduct or investment fraud, please contact a Green Firm attorney immediately for a free consultation at 1-855-462-3330.

Naming Names: FINRA's Disciplinary Action Report, February 2014

Each month and again on a quarterly basis, the agency that regulates the financial industry, FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority), produces a detailed report that runs down all disciplinary actions recently taken against brokerage firms and brokers. This long list of alleged wrongdoing and misconduct reads a lot like a police blotter. We strongly encourage any investor who suspects their broker and/or broker-dealer of having lost them money on dubious terms to at least skim this report to see if you recognize any names.

For our part, we like to highlight certain actions from each report. Specifically, we’re looking for schemes or abuses that might be more far-reaching than the individual cases processed by FINRA. In other words, we name names here because we hope to raise awareness out there about certain brokers and products that might otherwise go unnoticed except for the case appearing in the report.

For example, if you peruse this month’s list of offenses, you’ll find one particularly tricky security popping up repeatedly: the non-traditional ETF. For more information on non-traditional ETFs, please visit our webpage dedicated to the subject here.

Here are the latest disciplinary actions related to non-traditional ETFs as announced by FINRA:

 

PNC Investments LLC (CRD #129052, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) submitted a Letter of

Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm was censured, fined $275,000 and

ordered to pay $33,183.72, plus interest, in restitution to customers. Without admitting

or denying the findings, the firm consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of

findings that it failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written

procedures, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable NASD and/or FINRA

rules in connection with the sale of leveraged, inverse and inverse-leveraged ETFs (nontraditional ETFs). The findings stated that non-traditional ETFs have certain risks that are

not found in traditional ETFs, such as the risks associated with a daily reset, leverage and

compounding. The performance of non-traditional ETFs over longer periods of time can

differ significantly from the performance of their underlying index or benchmark, especially

in volatile markets. Nonetheless, the firm supervised non-traditional ETFs the same way

it supervised traditional ETFs. The firm relied on its general supervisory procedures to

supervise transactions in non-traditional ETFs. However, the general supervisory system

the firm had in place was not sufficiently tailored to address the unique features and

risks involved with these products. The findings also stated that the firm failed to provide

adequate formal training to registered representatives and supervisors regarding the

features, risks and characteristics of non-traditional ETFs. The firm allowed certain of its

registered representatives to recommend to customers a non-traditional ETF without

performing reasonable diligence to understand the risks and features associated with it.

(FINRA Case #2011028232801)

 

Silver Oak Securities, Incorporated (CRD #46947, Jackson, Tennessee) submitted a Letter

of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm was censured and fined $10,000.

Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the described sanctions

and to the entry of findings that it permitted a registered representative to recommend and

sell non-traditional ETFs to some of the firm’s customers. The findings stated that the firm

did not investigate the characteristics and risk factors of such products before allowing its

representative to recommend them to customers or provide its representatives any training

or other guidance specific to whether and when non-traditional ETFs might be appropriate

for their customers. The firm did not implement any procedures for supervising the firm’s

purchase and trading of non-traditional ETFs. Instead, it relied on supervisory systems

that were already in place. The findings also stated that as a result of the firm’s failure to

implement a supervisory system tailored to non-traditional ETFs, the firm did not monitor

transactions involving non-traditional ETFs, which would include tracking the volume of

customers’ holdings in non-traditional ETFs, as well as tracking the length of time open

positions were maintained in non-traditional ETFs, and any resulting unrealized losses. The

firm did not impose any limitations on trading or holding non-traditional ETFs. (FINRA Case

#2011026214301)

 

Stuart Alan Epley (CRD #3104478, Registered Representative, Rogers, Arkansas) submitted

a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was suspended from association

with any FINRA member in any capacity for three months. In light of Epley’s financial

status, no monetary sanction has been imposed. Without admitting or denying the

findings, Epley consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he

exercised discretion without written authorization by effecting transactions in customers’

accounts without obtaining the customers’ prior written authorization and without having

his member firm’s acceptance of the accounts as discretionary. The firm did not permit

discretionary trading with the exception of very limited use of time and price discretion.

The findings stated that Epley solicited unapproved securities in customers’ accounts. Epley

mismarked order tickets in order to purchase leveraged ETFs in the customers’ accounts.

The ETF transactions were all listed as unsolicited even though Epley had solicited them. Epley mismarked the leveraged ETF transactions as unsolicited because the firm prohibited

registered representatives from recommending leveraged ETFs. Epley’s mismarking of the

order tickets caused the firm’s books and records to be inaccurate regarding these trades.

The suspension is in effect from January 6, 2014, through April 5, 2014. (FINRA Case

#2012032504801)

 

FINRA Orders J.P. Turner to Pay More Than $700,000 in Restitution for Unsuitable Sales o fLeveraged and Inverse ETFs and for Excessive Mutual Fund Switching

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered Atlanta-based brokerdealer

J.P. Turner & Company, L.L.C. to pay $707,559 in restitution to 84 customers for sales

of unsuitable leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and for excessive mutual

fund switches.

Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, said, “Securities

firms and their registered reps must understand the complex products they are selling and

the risks inherent to the products, and be able to determine if they are suitable for investors

before recommending them to retail customers. Firms also have a fundamental obligation

to monitor conservative investments such as mutual funds to ensure that investors are not

abused by excessive trading.”

Leverged and inverse ETFs “reset” daily, meaning that they are designed to achieve

their stated objectives on a daily basis so their performance can quickly diverge from the

performance of the underlying index or benchmark. It is possible that investors could suffer

significant losses even if the long-term performance of the index showed a gain. This effect

can be magnified in volatile markets.

FINRA found that J.P. Turner failed to establish and maintain a reasonable supervisory

system and instead, supervised leveraged and inverse ETFs in the same manner that it

supervised traditional ETFs. The firm also failed to provide adequate training regarding

these ETFs. In addition, J.P. Turner allowed its registered representatives to recommend

these complex ETFs without performing reasonable diligence to understand the risks

and features associated with the products. As a result, many J.P. Turner customers held

leveraged and inverse ETFs for several months. J.P. Turner also failed to determine whether

the ETFs were suitable for at least 27 customers, including retirees and conservative

customers, who sustained collective net losses of more than $200,000.

 

FINRA’s investigation was conducted by the departments of Enforcement and Member Regulation

For the full February report by FINRA, please visit their website: www.finra.org